Bablosoft

smm in market prostsmm.com

@m4zuper Here is a link to a test page that you can use to test https://surveycheck.meinsight.online/sverify/MESTESTAC

This is a bump

@Roy-Mustang said in Новый модуль AI Captcha в BAS: полный разбор, настройка и реальные тесты:

Пожалуйста, а по статье может есть какие-то замечания, может лучше было ее разделить, или чото убавить? Просто что бы потом не читать заново не удобный текст

Я видео смотрел, да в целом все хорошо, мне не хватило только сравнения с другими моделями, так как уже на середине видео было ясно что сонет не очень хорошо справляется с капчами где нужно что нибудь перетягивать. Видно что он правильно разгадывает, но по итогу срабатывает какое - то смещение от нужной позиции. Вот интересно было бы собрать такой рейтинг моделей которые справляются лучше всего с конкретными капчами за свою стоимость.

@support said in Выпущена 30.7.0 версия BrowserAutomationStudio:

сейчас должно быть лучше. Скоро ждите новых апдейтов.

Подскажите, создание mcp не планируется?

Состояние сети за 24 часа
image.png
coldsmsbot.t.me - удобный сервис для приема смс
coldvpnebot.t.me - надежный впн с обходом бс
https://coldvpn.vitrinka.net - сайт впн с обходом бс

Статистика по приходу смс на сервис Steam за 24 часа
image.png
coldsmsbot.t.me - удобный сервис для приема смс
coldvpnebot.t.me - надежный впн с обходом бс

This is a bump

Изображение ChatGPT 5 окт. 2026 г., 13_23_18.png

Больше портов в Таиланде, больше возможностей для ваших задач!

Пополнили мобильные прокси Таиланда: новые порты доступны в Shared и Private. Самое время протестировать новое GEO или расширить текущую связку.

Выбирайте свой формат:

Shared-прокси: https://lteboost.com/en/?cat_id=15312 Приватные прокси: https://lteboost.com/en/?cat_id=14615

Скидка 15% по промокоду THAILAND15 на прокси Таиланда.

Наш сайт: https://lteboost.com/
Телеграм канал: https://t.me/lteboost_news
Техподдержка: https://t.me/ChatLtebot
Антидетект браузер: https://hide.ninja/

Про нжс выше.
Про тхт - дубли все тоже удаляются, про галочку - в записи вроде работает криво, там надо иногда бас закрыть и файл обновится, в запуске после завершения всегда отрабатывает 100%. Еще, если в 1 потоке работать без пересоздания его то нужно всё правильно настроить для работы с ресурсами, гляньте внимательнее.

Друзья, каталог ipv.rent пополнился: теперь доступны индивидуальные IPv4 прокси! 🚀

Статические адреса дата-центров в 21 стране: США , Германия, Нидерланды, Великобритания, Польша, Казахстан, Украина и другие. Каждый IP выдаётся в одни руки, поэтому его репутация и скорость зависят только от вашей работы.

Условия:

Цена — $1.49 за IP в месяц, одинаковая во всех странах. Есть аренда на неделю ($0.99), две недели ($1.29), а также на 2 и 3 месяца.
Выдача автоматическая: адреса, логин и пароль появляются в личном кабинете сразу после оплаты и начинают отвечать в течение 2 минут. HTTP и SOCKS5 работают на каждом адресе.
Есть автопродление: адреса и логин сохраняются.

Подмена отпечатка p0f — бесплатно.
UDP через SOCKS5 — для онлайн-игр, звонков в Telegram, VoIP и сервисов на QUIC.
Безлимитный трафик — платите за адрес, а не за гигабайты.

Для чего подойдут: мультиаккаунтинг, парсинг и мониторинг, белые списки по IP, антидетект-браузеры, Telegram, игры, доступ к сайтам с ограничением по стране 🥳

Промокод для новых пользователей: FIRSTDEPOSIT — +10% к сумме первого пополнения.

Впереди — мобильные, IPv6 и ISP.

Подробнее: https://ipv.rent/ru/ipv4/
Регистрация: https://app.ipv.rent/register

Промокод BABLOSOFT - 10% на первую покупку | Выдаем за отзыв на форуме 200 МБ трафика для тестирования

Добавили категорию Instagram на сайт. Теперь можно купить аккаунты Instagram в любом магазине нашего маркетплейса. Всем хорошего дня.

Поддержка: https://t.me/xmart_support_bot
Сайт: https://xmart.biz

No solution?

AI Captcha in BrowserAutomationStudio

If you want, you can just watch the video on YouTube. I tried to fit both a tutorial and a lot of testing into one video, and I also used diagrams to make everything easier to understand

https://youtu.be/qXkVmqoVlks

I also created a telegram channel where I’ll share my thoughts and interesting stuff. For now, I’ve posted the mind maps from the video and some articles there: https://t.me/mustangbasen

This article is basically a shorter text version. First we will look at how the module works and what is in the settings, then I will show what happened in real tests with different captchas and compare the models by results, requests, tokens and cost

What we are going to look at

Captchas I tested with real examples

CAPTCHAs used in the test

I did not just look at the settings and assume the module worked. I actually ran it on different captchas and checked what it could solve. These were included in the tests:

reCAPTCHA v2 26:22 hCaptcha 33:50 GeeTest v4 44:51 Cloudflare Turnstile 50:49 GeeTest Adaptive 52:29 GeeTest v3 56:57 Basic text from an image 1:03:55 Click captcha 1:05:16 Rotate captcha 1:08:31 MTCaptcha 1:12:13

I also wanted to test Prosopo, but I could not test it properly because the test page was unavailable

What AI Captcha actually does

How AI Captcha works

Put simply, AI Captcha solves a visible captcha inside the built-in BAS browser. It takes a screenshot, sends it to the models, gets commands back and then clicks, drags something or types text into a field

The model does not control the mouse by itself. It just looks at the image and tells BAS where to click, what to drag and where to type. BAS then does the actual work in the browser

I tested all of this in the new BrowserAutomationStudio 30.9.0 release

Why there are two models

How the two models work

At this point you might be wondering why the module needs two models at all. It looks like BAS could just send the screenshot to one model and let it handle everything. Basically, the work is split so an expensive model is not used for every small check

The secondary model sees the whole BAS browser screen. It finds the captcha, works out its boundaries, can click a basic checkbox and then checks whether the captcha is solved. You can use something cheaper here because the job is usually pretty simple

The main model receives the cropped captcha itself. This is the model that needs to understand what is on the image, what it is supposed to do and how to solve it. So this is where it makes sense to use a stronger model

And BAS is basically the executor here. It takes screenshots, crops the captcha, checks the model response, maps the coordinates back to the page and moves the mouse

Actions the model returns to BAS

The main model can return three types of actions:

click clicks a point using the x and y coordinates

drag moves something from the from point to the to point

type clicks a field and enters text

It can also return several actions in one response. For example, it can select several images and then press the confirmation button. So BAS does not need a separate request for every single click

What I entered in the BAS action

Main AI Captcha action settings

I used OpenRouter for these tests. The convenient part is that you can switch between different models through one provider. You just need to create an account there and copy your key, and I showed how to do all of that in the video

In the video I go through OpenRouter in detail, starting with account registration: watch from 16:34

Let's start with the main settings in the captcha-solving action:

Main provider is the provider

Main token is the key for the main model

Main model is the main model that will solve the captcha

Secondary provider, Secondary token and Secondary model are the same settings for the secondary model that finds the captcha and then checks the result

Instructions is where you can tell the model what kind of captcha you are solving and how it should solve it

I underestimated Instructions at first. A model can usually work out a simple captcha by itself. But when it needs to click objects in order, solve a puzzle captcha or understand some unclear mechanic, it starts messing up, wasting requests or saying it is done while the captcha is still sitting there. So, basically, try to write the instructions for the specific captcha you are solving right away

How to add a model from OpenRouter

How to move a model from OpenRouter to BAS

If the model you need is missing from the ready-made list and you are using OpenRouter, open its page, copy the exact Model ID and paste the full value into the model field, just like I showed in the screenshot

I chose three main models for this project:

qwen/qwen3.8-27b:free as the free one

google/gemini-3.8-flash as the cheap one

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5 as the expensive one

Models and prices change all the time. There was no special logic behind this selection, I just wanted to test what each model could do and how the module worked overall

Advanced settings

Advanced AI Captcha action settings

AI Captcha action result and log

There are a lot of settings in the Advanced tab, so here is what each one does:

Main thinking and Secondary thinking control how hard the models think about the task. Start with low. If the model completely fails, try high, because that really helped on many tasks

Max steps is 14 by default. If the main model sends 14 responses and still gets nowhere, the action ends with an error. For some rotate captchas it is better to allow more steps

Check interval and Stability timeout make BAS wait after a click or drag instead of taking another screenshot while the page is still changing

Timeout limits the whole action by time. The default is 300 seconds (5 minutes)

API timeout gives one model request up to 60 seconds. If you use free models, set it to 120 or even 180 seconds right away

API attempts is 3 by default. That means one normal request and up to two more attempts if the provider temporarily fails

Main compression and Secondary compression resize the images. More compression means fewer image tokens, but the model may simply stop seeing small text and details, so this needs testing

Similarity helps BAS decide whether the page has stopped changing. The default is 97 percent

Summary and Full log are just for debugging. Summary shows a short action history, while Full log saves the complete log with screenshots and page data

Result is saved to AI_CAPTCHA_RESULT. It shows the number of steps and requests, token usage and runtime

Reason is saved separately to AI_CAPTCHA_REASON. It contains the short completion reason, for example model_done or no_captcha. model_done still does not mean the site actually accepted the captcha, so it is better to check the page separately after the action

How the whole thing works step by step

How one solve runs

Basically, it works like this:

BAS takes a browser screenshot

The secondary model checks whether a captcha is there and where it is

If it is just a checkbox, the secondary model can click it itself

If a challenge appears, BAS crops it and sends it to the main model

The main model returns clicks, drags or text

BAS performs the actions and waits until the page stops changing

BAS takes another screenshot and checks everything again

This keeps going in a loop. It stops when the captcha disappears, the model thinks it is solved, the overall timeout runs out or the main model uses all 14 responses

What kinds of captcha the module can solve

Supported CAPTCHA types

If a captcha can be solved from an image with clicks, dragging or text input, the module can at least try. That includes checkboxes, image selection, text from an image, sliders, image rotation, drag-and-drop and clicking objects in a particular order

It obviously does not solve audio captchas or invisible captchas like recaptcha_v3

I had some partial success with dynamic hCaptcha, but it never worked consistently. One challenge had a wasp flying between several flowers, and then you had to pick the flower it had never landed on

That was where the model started messing up, because it receives separate images instead of a video. It simply could not properly track which flowers the wasp had landed on. Basically, maybe you could get it working by spending a lot of time on good instructions and testing different models, but challenges like this probably will not work right away, if they can even be solved with this module at all

Dynamic hCaptcha example

What happened with the models

Main model comparison

Looking only at the saved runs where the main model was actually called, I got this:

Qwen 3.8 27B free made 19 requests, used 49,952 tokens and cost $0

Gemini 3.8 Flash made 44 requests, used 104,095 tokens and cost $0.097

Claude Sonnet 5 made 92 requests, used 306,285 tokens and cost $0.628

These costs include both the main and secondary models used in each run. I left Turnstile out because the main model was not called there at all

And this is where things got interesting. Claude Sonnet 5 understood the image quickly and usually understood what it was supposed to do. But sometimes its coordinates were just awful. The much cheaper Gemini 3.8 Flash ended up working better on my GeeTest puzzles

So yeah, choosing the most expensive model and expecting it to solve everything is not going to work. You need to take the actual captcha and see which model behaves normally on that particular task

What happened with each captcha

Results for each CAPTCHA

reCAPTCHA v2: there was not much to say here, just a normal image selection challenge. All three models solved it

hCaptcha: Gemini and Claude sometimes handled the static tasks, so they have a partial result. As soon as adaptive captchas appeared, everything started falling apart and the results were weak. There are a lot of different hCaptcha tasks, so I think the module can solve many of them, but the one with the wasp seems impossible to me)))

GeeTest v4 and GeeTest v3: the free Qwen model completely failed. Claude seemed to understand the puzzle, but then returned terrible coordinates and moved the slider to the wrong place. Gemini solved the puzzle, and I ran GeeTest v4 again later and it solved it again

Cloudflare Turnstile: this one was really simple. The secondary model clicked the checkbox and checked the result. The main model was not even needed

GeeTest Adaptive: Gemini solved it. Claude selected the correct objects but clicked slightly outside the right spots, so the whole thing failed. The free model first missed the captcha completely and then hit a free pool rate limit

Text from an image and MTCaptcha: all three models solved them. There is not much to break down here, the model recognized the characters, entered them into the field and that was it

Click captcha: Qwen would start correctly and then mess up later, so it only got a partial result. Gemini and Claude solved it in the saved runs

Rotate captcha: it basically ate more money than anything else. The free model got confused, Gemini hit the timeout and Claude finally solved it. Even Claude needed a ton of repeated checks, and the two saved runs averaged about $0.145 each

There were 10 captcha types, 161 model requests and 474,965 tokens. The saved runs cost about ~$0.727. These are not super accurate numbers, just a rough estimate. Overall I spent $3 on the whole project, which included 80-100 different captchas across three models, because a lot happened off camera and I also had to reshoot parts

What I learned from all of this

What the tests showed

The most expensive model is not automatically the best one. Claude understood the tasks faster, but its coordinates were awful and that broke the whole solve. Gemini was cheaper and simply worked better on several puzzles

Good instructions make a real difference too. If you throw some weird captcha at a model without explaining anything, it may sit there thinking, mix up the order and burn through requests. I would explain what needs to be selected, where it needs to be dragged and when the model should press confirm, literally explain everything like you would to a small child

With thinking, I would keep it simple. Start with low and see whether the model can handle the captcha. If it keeps messing up, try high. There is not much point in using high everywhere from the start because it can mean more time and more tokens

And one AI Captcha action probably will not be enough in a real project. I saw provider errors, invalid actions, bad coordinates and models deciding they were done too early. So you need an error handler, a limited number of retries and a normal page check after the captcha

Free models can work too, but you should expect some hassle. They solved simple text captchas, reCAPTCHA and Turnstile in my tests. The shared OpenRouter free pool was sometimes overloaded though, so I got a 429 error and a simple captcha could take several minutes. It is fine if you just want to try the module, but for regular work I would look for something more stable

So what is the result

Overall, I liked the module. It is not tied to one traditional captcha-solving service, and you can try different models to see which one works better for a particular captcha

You need to understand that this is not one button where you click once and it solves everything by itself. You really have to sit down and test it: try different models, change the instructions, switch between low and high thinking, see where things break and run it again. Most of the result comes down to testing, because one model may solve one captcha normally and completely fail on another

Everything about the action itself and its settings was checked in BrowserAutomationStudio 30.9.0. The models, prices and free-pool conditions were current when I ran the tests

@juwiqi said in Нужен авторегер на облачных телефонах:

Как так, что никто не откликнулся..

Суммы условные, придуманы для примера.

Ищу опытного разработчика, которому интересна нестандартная задача: автоматизация регистрации аккаунтов на облачных телефонах.

Сценарий: создать профиль, открыть приложение, зарегистрировать аккаунт на почте, выйти и повторить цикл.

Основная сложность — нестабильная среда: приложение вылетает через 4–6 минут, иногда зависает экран. Нужно подобрать способ автоматизации и обработки таких сбоев. Невысокая скорость и пропуск неудачных попыток допустимы.

Бюджет на первую версию — $700–$1,000. Предварительную проверку готов оплатить отдельно: $100–$150, объём согласуем заранее. По её результатам уточним возможности автоматизации, требования, сроки и окончательную стоимость разработки.

Подробного ТЗ пока нет. Названия сервисов, доступ и процесс регистрации покажу. Хотелось бы найти человека, которому интересно разобраться в этой задаче и предложить практичное решение. Выбор технологий оставляю исполнителю.

Для первой версии достаточно ограниченного рабочего сценария с согласованными правилами обработки ошибок. Дальнейшие улучшения обсудим и оценим отдельно.

Если задача заинтересовала, напишите о похожем опыте и с чего предложили бы начать.

6aec959a-c289-44ff-8351-de652040343f-image.png
Колумбийский статический прокси от Lietpark Communications — удобный выбор для работы с локальными сервисами и платформами, которым требуется постоянный IP Колумбии. Реальная ISP-сеть и выделенный адрес позволяют сохранять стабильную геолокацию и использовать один IP между сессиями.

Ссылка

Support @detect_support_bot

Today IP Pool Add: +217,273
Total Network: 200M+ IPs
⚡ Own Infrastructure | No Middlemen
Starting from $1/GB

1Popularity.com – Smm Panel

Актуальные цены и наличие по четырём типам прокси можно проверить в каталоге WorldProxy: https://wproxy.online/ru