@robertbaldwin Good afternoon, It must be some kind of error, your key that you showed in the screenshot should work until the specified deadline.
Fake Faild Fingerprint Warning of danger to your account.
-
I am currently using base 28.1.0 but it is dangerous when fingerprint does not work leading to the death of 4000 of my gmail accounts. It is terrible.
-
H hoanghiep1x0 deleted this topic on
-
H hoanghiep1x0 restored this topic on
-
For any checker or site, you can find the correct fingerprint settings or filter the appropriate fingerprints.
Sometimes the result may be negative, but you can filter this.If the fingerprint does not pass the check on any checker, this does not mean that the target website will regard you as a robot. Also, vice versa, if the fingerprint passes the checkers - this does not mean that you will be able to successfully work with all Internet resources.
I want to say that the selection of the correct proxy, browser settings and fingerprint for a specific website is possible only by testing on this specific website. Relying on the results of checkers and thinking that everything is good/not good is not the right approach. -
@m4zuper Can you share your code to properly use fingerprint with setup proxy.
-
This post is deleted!
-
@hoanghiep1x0
I did it this way, but sometimes there are prints that don't pass the test.
iphey.xml -
I checked it and it's still red, most likely the detech is a bot.
-
I don't know what the problem is with BAS, but in many of my work, working on BAS has detected bot traffic, while other anti-detect browsers, such as Ads Power, Anty Dolphin and gologin have not detect, while BAS automation is much better then other but I don't now why the detect his browser. Compared to them. I have also used a custom fingerprint server to capture fingerprints of my organic traffic, but that didn't helpful for me
If someone one have solution please tell me 🥹
-
@MAB-Tech u need experience with bas to bypass antifrode systems. i can tell u that just using fingerprints from FS is not enough. u can find someone who can bypass it for you, or do ur own research about BAS authenticity on forum, there is many information on it
-
@nedarwin1217 Thank you very much for your reply.
Can you please point me to any video or article related to bypassing the anti-fraud system that is related to BAS?
And does this work the same for all websites or does each website have to be analyzed separately?
-
@MAB-Tech said in Fake Faild Fingerprint Warning of danger to your account.:
Can you please point me to any video or article related to bypassing the anti-fraud system that is related to BAS?
u can search something like "UDP" on the forum to reach some article about bypassing.
@MAB-Tech said in Fake Faild Fingerprint Warning of danger to your account.:
And does this work the same for all websites or does each website have to be analyzed separately?
This - what? Its not about single setting that ll bypass all antifrode systems for u. There are many aspects of good software. Every site need an individual approach, but often a person with experience can understand other systems with the same success
-
I am trying to contact you on Telegram but I am unsuccessful. Can you tell me your WhatsApp or any other contact method?
As you have advised me to bypass the anti-fraud system, I hope you can do this job well. Can you help me learn all this?
-
@MAB-Tech write me ur @ tg here or in bas messages so i can write u first
-
@nedarwin1217 I'm trying to reply in BAS msg but there are also face error
It's my tg id
@MAB_Tech -
I am familiar with many of the latest antidetect tools that deliver the most practical results, such as GemLogin, GenLogin, GMP, and GoLogin. They all excel at device fakery, but their automation tools are not as effective as BAS. However, the most important aspect is still good device fakery because, without it, automation would be ineffective.
I appreciate BAS for keeping up with antidetect updates. The support team informed me that BAS will undergo changes soon, and I hope this issue will be resolved.
