8154bd75-ec3f-4602-aef9-b64e6726ec31-image.png 3e28a18c-6545-4800-904a-d2c751dc1a32-image.png
It can be loaded via chrome://extensions/, but the folder cannot be selected when Load unpacked is said.
I still think it is a critical bug in BAS.
ipbinding.online is working in BAS instandly without proxy.
Using a fast proxy with UDP support in BAS is not working.
When ipbinding.online can detect "WebRTC ist blocked at network level" then everyone can.
It is a strong indicator that you are using a proxy.
But it seems noone from BAS cares about it.
@FastSpace said in WebRTC is not working with BAS:
@Grassman проблема в твоих прокси, они говно.
7 бед один ответ xD
@usertrue said in WebRTC is not working with BAS:
@FastSpace said in WebRTC is not working with BAS:
@Grassman проблема в твоих прокси, они говно.
7 бед один ответ xD
На дворе 2025 год, куча всяких разных ИИ. Все тебе расскажут и помогут
Но нет, ведь же находиться люди кто приходит на помойку в шоп с прокси и пытается в этой помойке найти вкусный торт с вишенкой найти хорошие прокси. Все ищет, ищет и не находит. Так не ходи на помойку господи.
You think there are no UDP proxies available?
I do not think so.
iproyal.com has UDP support and you can test it for example here: https://abrahamjuliot.github.io/creepjs/
But UDP support does not automatically mean BAS can handle WebRTC with UDP.
ipbinding.online is still not working with BAS.
I have tried different UDP proxy seller.
It is arrogant to say the whole world is selling UDP proxies that are not working and BAS is the only thing working correctly.
If this is true then proof it.