was asked in russian thread to give usage example for debuging
here is the answer:
In script creation, when looking and testing selectors on dynamic sites (such as Google and social networks), you may need to navigate through multiple screens and perform various checks. When you find a selector that seems suitable, and you deploy the script to run on 500 profiles with different fingerprints and accounts, you might encounter many 'selector not found' or 'failed to wait for selectors' errors.
In such situations, it's not always clear whether the issue is due to a specific fingerprint or account, or if the script didn't wait long enough for the selector to appear. Additionally, it might be unclear on which screen the error occurred. In these cases, it's possible that other selectors for the same element are present, and you may need to adjust the logic accordingly.
Putting the actions from this module in all suspected places and logging the results would help in figuring everything out in one action, instead of checking each thing one by one. For example, determining the current URL, checking its content, verifying the presence and visibility of selectors, and experimenting with extended waiting times could all be addressed together. This approach is more efficient than tackling each aspect individually, such as checking: Is this selector present? Is it visible? If I wait longer, would it be present? Maybe the selector, in this case, has too many elements and thus can't pinpoint one?