Improve the fingerprint switcher

[GhostZ]

@zw, because the developer is only one, and in the day only 24 hours

[A Former User]

what do you mean? What kind of things you want to improve?

[zw]

@Bigma For example what the first two posts mentioned. And it was not addressed by support at all which gives me the impression the Fingerprint Switcher is not actively being developed or the developer doesn't care about customers.

Nevertheless I went ahead and gave the free version a try, but noticed issues. See separate thread.

[A Former User]

das you set fingerprint properly?

[GhostZ]

@zw, the forum is answered by software users in their free time and at will, for questions to the developer there is premium support

[A Former User]

@zw you are saying: are lots of things that could possibly be improved
But I see you are told only about font hash?

[zw]

@Bigma said in Improve the fingerprint switcher:

das you set fingerprint properly?

Yes, I'm setting it this way.

[A Former User]

@zw only the font hash is an issue?

[zw]

@Bigma said in Improve the fingerprint switcher:

@zw you are saying: are lots of things that could possibly be improved
But I see you are told only about font hash?

I never said this. I'm saying the concerns of other users have never been addressed and this gives me a lack of trust for the product and support.

And my first 15 minutes of playing around with the Fingerprint Switcher seem to support this impression, since the second fingerprint parameter I compared already was detected by http://f.vision.

Why are you even attacking me? If you're a user or fan of BAS and fingerprint switcher, you should rather be concerned about my issue and be interested in a solution.

[A Former User]

@zw You find a problem with font hash. Is it all?

[zw]

@Bigma said in Improve the fingerprint switcher:

@zw only the font hash is an issue?

I have only compared font hash and screen resolution so far.
It was a first try and I just wanted to check if I did it right and if it works.