Bablosoft

FingerprintSwitcher service 1.1.0 has been released | Сервис FingerprintSwitcher версии 1.1.0

Bablosoft News

  • supportS

    BrowserAutomationStudio 28.2.0 has been released

    Locked Bablosoft News
    7 Votes
    1 Posts
    1514 Views
    No one has replied
  • supportS

    BrowserAutomationStudio 26.3.0 has been released

    Bablosoft News
    4 Votes
    6 Posts
    1489 Views
    D

    @Fox Yes, unfortunately, it works smoothly in other services, but xevil does not work. I could not understand this. If you wish, I can send you the xevil information on the server privately and you can try it yourself.

  • supportS

    BrowserAutomationStudio 25.8.0 has been released

    Bablosoft News
    6 Votes
    6 Posts
    1575 Views
    S

    Is there a time when the new version will be released?

  • supportS

    BrowserAutomationStudio 22.8.1 has been released

    Bablosoft News
    4 Votes
    3 Posts
    1288 Views
    J

    @support hi, Since yesterday's update BAS is detected as a bot by google,
    I already wrote a post about it :
    https://community.bablosoft.com/topic/11706/urgent-since-today-06-28-2020-bas-is-detected-as-a-bot-by-google-after-update

    It is now impossible to obtain an acceptable score (0.7), my bot worked with a score of 0.7 before the update.

    BAS VERSION : 22.8.1
    OS : WINDOWS 10 64BITS
    TEST PROJECT * : SCORE.xml
    *The test project make a loop :

    Reset Browser Set browser setting Get new fingerprint "Windows7,Chrome" (you need a fingerprintswitcher key...) Apply fingerprint Set proxy (to synchronize language/geolocation/webrtc/timezone) Run google check link Capture score Display score Result in result tab 1 whit a status (PASS or FAIL) Start again (to get and try another fingerprint)

    You you just have to launch it and look in result tab ...

    thank you.

  • supportS

    BrowserAutomationStudio 22.3.0 has been released

    Bablosoft News
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    2831 Views
    supportS

    @gudolik

    Ok, here we go again. Your server is sensitive to input information. That is not rule, but exception on the web. Because when I tested it without proxy and without required headers, it just holds session infinite. That is not how servers works. They usually closes session with some error code. There are several cases, like headers, but not only headers. I don't own a server source code, so I can't say for sure about all things.

    This thing is also important.

    browser makes connection, sends request to ****, then make a couple of more requests, maybe makes more parallel connections, and then persist them for a long time, then maybe close. Browser also saves cookies from a first request and then sends it to ****/uk/account/loginmobile. HTTP client does only one connection and closes it immediately.

    Your initial case was "No response for a certain amount of time from http client if you are working with proxy".

    It is resolved. Because I've send you a project which resolves issue and always works. I've even provided a proxy to test.

    I've tried to understand, at least what problem we are trying to solve, but there is no answser for a direct question. You told about a history what you have tried, and what results did you get. That is not the issue, it is your experience.

    If you have certain error, that might be because of proxy, because of BAS, because of curl, or because of anything else. Issue must contain a steps, how it can be repeated and strict description. I can't see this.

    The only issue that I saw in your last message is:

    said in BrowserAutomationStudio 22.3.0 has been released:

    But adding -k or --insecure its fixes and thats what im asking you to do to add these in http curl requests. to fix the issue.

    Which is obviously not correct, because:

    --insecure is included by default. https://github.com/bablosoft/BAS/search?q=CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER&unscoped_q=CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER If the issue is with --insecure, it can easily can be fixed by adding it to curl command line, but it not. See failure examples, that I've sent to you. Missing --insecure command line param would give another error, something like "SSL peer certificate or SSH remote key was not OK" Issue reproduces on http:// scheme, which is obviously not influenced with this param.

    If you want to report about issue, please use following guide.
    https://community.bablosoft.com/topic/2707/how-to-correctly-report-about-error
    Further messages about this case, which doesn't match following guide will be ignored.