Seems like the fingerprint switcher can not pass some elements that for example multilogin can pass in the detection area. Is it possible to improve these things or change them by ourself?
Seems like there are lots of things that could possibly be improved.
Why does the admin resp. owner of the software not respond here?
Users interested in the Fingerprint Switcher typically will first browse the forum and see that there's no response to user posts.
It's a pity since BAS looks promising, but without proper fingerprint techniques it's not usable for many purposes.
what do you mean? What kind of things you want to improve?
@Bigma For example what the first two posts mentioned. And it was not addressed by support at all which gives me the impression the Fingerprint Switcher is not actively being developed or the developer doesn't care about customers.
Nevertheless I went ahead and gave the free version a try, but noticed issues. See separate thread.
das you set fingerprint properly?
@Bigma said in Improve the fingerprint switcher:
@zw you are saying: are lots of things that could possibly be improved
But I see you are told only about font hash?
I never said this. I'm saying the concerns of other users have never been addressed and this gives me a lack of trust for the product and support.
And my first 15 minutes of playing around with the Fingerprint Switcher seem to support this impression, since the second fingerprint parameter I compared already was detected by http://f.vision.
Why are you even attacking me? If you're a user or fan of BAS and fingerprint switcher, you should rather be concerned about my issue and be interested in a solution.
@zw You find a problem with font hash. Is it all?
