Bablosoft

Выпущена 21.6.1 версия BrowserAutomationStudio

Bablosoft News

  • supportS

    Выпущена 25.8.0 версия BrowserAutomationStudio

    Bablosoft News
    18 Votes
    89 Posts
    15355 Views
    sergerdnS

    @UserTrue said in Выпущена 25.8.0 версия BrowserAutomationStudio:

    Почему в БАС время меняется отпечаток ssl ? В обычных браузерах он меняется только на разных версиях

    Не знаю, нашел ли ты причину, но Google постепенно раскатывал на свои браузеры рандомизацию TLS ClientHello, если говорить проще, то fingerprint JA3 стал не совсем актуален, как минимум для Chrome.

    https://www.fastly.com/blog/a-first-look-at-chromes-tls-clienthello-permutation-in-the-wild

  • supportS

    Выпущена 25.6.0 версия BrowserAutomationStudio

    Bablosoft News
    23 Votes
    180 Posts
    35415 Views
    B

    @basuser123
    добавлю к этому - может стоило бы дополнительные движки встраивать не в бас, а просто отдельными библиотеками просто делать. это было бы удобно, кому надо тот собирал бы все версии которые ему нужны и подключал бы к бас, а кому не нужны - тот бы их просто не качал.
    а сейчас получается только 2 движка 119 и 120 и все, старых нет, хотя отпечатки есть, почему бы их отдельно не выложить
    ну и с автоматизацией натягивания движка тоже неплохо чтоб решили, это же, как говорит )

    @Fox said in TelegramAdvanced:

    программа называется "BrowserAutomationStudio", а не "BrowserManualStudio".

  • supportS

    Выпущена 25.5.0 версия BrowserAutomationStudio

    Bablosoft News
    10 Votes
    49 Posts
    9470 Views
    FastSpaceF

    @Dodok Когда твои потом проекты прилягут, визжи поменьше.

  • supportS

    Выпущена 23.2.0 версия BrowserAutomationStudio

    Bablosoft News
    20 Votes
    93 Posts
    16387 Views
    Y

    @support , смотрю, пожирнел ба(р)сик. А что за папка custom с похожим набором файлов?

  • supportS

    BrowserAutomationStudio 22.3.0 has been released

    Bablosoft News
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    2820 Views
    supportS

    @gudolik

    Ok, here we go again. Your server is sensitive to input information. That is not rule, but exception on the web. Because when I tested it without proxy and without required headers, it just holds session infinite. That is not how servers works. They usually closes session with some error code. There are several cases, like headers, but not only headers. I don't own a server source code, so I can't say for sure about all things.

    This thing is also important.

    browser makes connection, sends request to ****, then make a couple of more requests, maybe makes more parallel connections, and then persist them for a long time, then maybe close. Browser also saves cookies from a first request and then sends it to ****/uk/account/loginmobile. HTTP client does only one connection and closes it immediately.

    Your initial case was "No response for a certain amount of time from http client if you are working with proxy".

    It is resolved. Because I've send you a project which resolves issue and always works. I've even provided a proxy to test.

    I've tried to understand, at least what problem we are trying to solve, but there is no answser for a direct question. You told about a history what you have tried, and what results did you get. That is not the issue, it is your experience.

    If you have certain error, that might be because of proxy, because of BAS, because of curl, or because of anything else. Issue must contain a steps, how it can be repeated and strict description. I can't see this.

    The only issue that I saw in your last message is:

    said in BrowserAutomationStudio 22.3.0 has been released:

    But adding -k or --insecure its fixes and thats what im asking you to do to add these in http curl requests. to fix the issue.

    Which is obviously not correct, because:

    --insecure is included by default. https://github.com/bablosoft/BAS/search?q=CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER&unscoped_q=CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER If the issue is with --insecure, it can easily can be fixed by adding it to curl command line, but it not. See failure examples, that I've sent to you. Missing --insecure command line param would give another error, something like "SSL peer certificate or SSH remote key was not OK" Issue reproduces on http:// scheme, which is obviously not influenced with this param.

    If you want to report about issue, please use following guide.
    https://community.bablosoft.com/topic/2707/how-to-correctly-report-about-error
    Further messages about this case, which doesn't match following guide will be ignored.