Bablosoft

Выпущена 24.0.2 версия BrowserAutomationStudio

Bablosoft News

  • supportS

    BrowserAutomationStudio 28.0.0 has been released

    Bablosoft News
    3 Votes
    9 Posts
    2488 Views
    G

    @morpheus93, no, 28.0.0 is the latest for now

    b06b0fc1-eb7e-48bf-96a2-a7a7577c71f8-image.png

  • supportS

    Выпущена 26.4.0 версия BrowserAutomationStudio

    Bablosoft News
    15 Votes
    59 Posts
    11216 Views
    FoxF

    @imperiaslplus said in Выпущена 26.4.0 версия BrowserAutomationStudio:

    Доброго времени суток! Где скачать версию26.4.0 BrowserAutomationStudio?

    Эм, сейчас последняя версия 26.4.1, для чего качать предпоследнюю версию?

  • supportS

    Выпущена 25.5.0 версия BrowserAutomationStudio

    Bablosoft News
    10 Votes
    49 Posts
    11124 Views
    FastSpaceF

    @Dodok Когда твои потом проекты прилягут, визжи поменьше.

  • supportS

    Выпущена 24.7.1 версия BrowserAutomationStudio

    Bablosoft News
    12 Votes
    52 Posts
    11630 Views
    andreiemA

    @super84 said in Выпущена 24.7.1 версия BrowserAutomationStudio:

    @Kinokio Тут нельзя конечно Переговариваться мол.
    Но всё же рискну :
    Вы вот по Рамблеру, в точку.
    Он Капчу как её не решай, он выдаёт что не верно.
    Чисто вот взял на Лолзе Бесплатный Авторегер и его Исходник глянул и переделал даж что бы по Уму, с Отпечатками и тп, но сук реально как в Яндексе, если они видят Ботность, они будут говорить, что не верно решённая Капча.
    Это Утечка.
    Опять же это Тестовая версия и наш главный Разраб хоть бы живой был, он с Украины же и вот Отписывал.

    Кстати, чёт Fox не видать и я за него уж переживаю :(

    Do you think @support is ok? I think he is from Kiev

  • supportS

    BrowserAutomationStudio 22.3.0 has been released

    Bablosoft News
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    3326 Views
    supportS

    @gudolik

    Ok, here we go again. Your server is sensitive to input information. That is not rule, but exception on the web. Because when I tested it without proxy and without required headers, it just holds session infinite. That is not how servers works. They usually closes session with some error code. There are several cases, like headers, but not only headers. I don't own a server source code, so I can't say for sure about all things.

    This thing is also important.

    browser makes connection, sends request to ****, then make a couple of more requests, maybe makes more parallel connections, and then persist them for a long time, then maybe close. Browser also saves cookies from a first request and then sends it to ****/uk/account/loginmobile. HTTP client does only one connection and closes it immediately.

    Your initial case was "No response for a certain amount of time from http client if you are working with proxy".

    It is resolved. Because I've send you a project which resolves issue and always works. I've even provided a proxy to test.

    I've tried to understand, at least what problem we are trying to solve, but there is no answser for a direct question. You told about a history what you have tried, and what results did you get. That is not the issue, it is your experience.

    If you have certain error, that might be because of proxy, because of BAS, because of curl, or because of anything else. Issue must contain a steps, how it can be repeated and strict description. I can't see this.

    The only issue that I saw in your last message is:

    said in BrowserAutomationStudio 22.3.0 has been released:

    But adding -k or --insecure its fixes and thats what im asking you to do to add these in http curl requests. to fix the issue.

    Which is obviously not correct, because:

    --insecure is included by default. https://github.com/bablosoft/BAS/search?q=CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER&unscoped_q=CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER If the issue is with --insecure, it can easily can be fixed by adding it to curl command line, but it not. See failure examples, that I've sent to you. Missing --insecure command line param would give another error, something like "SSL peer certificate or SSH remote key was not OK" Issue reproduces on http:// scheme, which is obviously not influenced with this param.

    If you want to report about issue, please use following guide.
    https://community.bablosoft.com/topic/2707/how-to-correctly-report-about-error
    Further messages about this case, which doesn't match following guide will be ignored.