Bablosoft

Выпущена 24.0.2 версия BrowserAutomationStudio

Bablosoft News

  • supportS

    BrowserAutomationStudio 26.9.0 has been released

    Bablosoft News
    4 Votes
    3 Posts
    1306 Views
    FoxF

    @fanspro said in BrowserAutomationStudio 26.9.0 has been released:

    Hallo, Plase share Modul Logger

    Modul Logger? And what does support have to do with it?

  • supportS

    Выпущена 26.8.0 версия BrowserAutomationStudio

    Bablosoft News
    6 Votes
    61 Posts
    10372 Views
    ?

    @FastSpace said in Выпущена 26.8.0 версия BrowserAutomationStudio:

    Если разработчик сделает антифрод и защиту от других антиков и от самого себя (недопускать сбор отпечатков с баса), тогда любой сможет зайти на форум баса и выкрасть эту защиту. Такое уже было, когда стояла защита от селекторов. Она попала в паблик, разработчик её убрал.

    Просто не нужно с форума и сайта бас их собирать)) И кстати меньше мусора само по себе будет. Потому что многие кто работает с бас все время сидят в интернете в антиков по привычке ))

  • supportS

    BrowserAutomationStudio 26.6.0 has been released

    Bablosoft News
    2 Votes
    5 Posts
    1642 Views
    M

    @support Thank you for sharing your results. Just noticed your 26.7.0 release. Looks great and seems to fix a lot of problems caused by generating code by AI.

    It will probably only take a short time when open source LLM's become powerful enough to self host it and use it for code generation related e.g. to BAS.
    This will completely revolutionize bot creation and I'm already looking forward to it :) Thank you for your appreciated work!

  • supportS

    BrowserAutomationStudio 24.1.0 has been released

    Bablosoft News
    5 Votes
    13 Posts
    3401 Views
    O

    How to download previous version 24.1.0

  • supportS

    BrowserAutomationStudio 22.3.0 has been released

    Bablosoft News
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    3159 Views
    supportS

    @gudolik

    Ok, here we go again. Your server is sensitive to input information. That is not rule, but exception on the web. Because when I tested it without proxy and without required headers, it just holds session infinite. That is not how servers works. They usually closes session with some error code. There are several cases, like headers, but not only headers. I don't own a server source code, so I can't say for sure about all things.

    This thing is also important.

    browser makes connection, sends request to ****, then make a couple of more requests, maybe makes more parallel connections, and then persist them for a long time, then maybe close. Browser also saves cookies from a first request and then sends it to ****/uk/account/loginmobile. HTTP client does only one connection and closes it immediately.

    Your initial case was "No response for a certain amount of time from http client if you are working with proxy".

    It is resolved. Because I've send you a project which resolves issue and always works. I've even provided a proxy to test.

    I've tried to understand, at least what problem we are trying to solve, but there is no answser for a direct question. You told about a history what you have tried, and what results did you get. That is not the issue, it is your experience.

    If you have certain error, that might be because of proxy, because of BAS, because of curl, or because of anything else. Issue must contain a steps, how it can be repeated and strict description. I can't see this.

    The only issue that I saw in your last message is:

    said in BrowserAutomationStudio 22.3.0 has been released:

    But adding -k or --insecure its fixes and thats what im asking you to do to add these in http curl requests. to fix the issue.

    Which is obviously not correct, because:

    --insecure is included by default. https://github.com/bablosoft/BAS/search?q=CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER&unscoped_q=CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER If the issue is with --insecure, it can easily can be fixed by adding it to curl command line, but it not. See failure examples, that I've sent to you. Missing --insecure command line param would give another error, something like "SSL peer certificate or SSH remote key was not OK" Issue reproduces on http:// scheme, which is obviously not influenced with this param.

    If you want to report about issue, please use following guide.
    https://community.bablosoft.com/topic/2707/how-to-correctly-report-about-error
    Further messages about this case, which doesn't match following guide will be ignored.